This should actually never be an issue with that it construction; Sir John de Keith d

This should actually never be an issue with that it construction; Sir John de Keith d

Re: ? Comyn partner away from Malise

Towards Comyn daughter who was simply spouse out-of Malise out-of Strathearn, I got theorized in 2005 one to she was basically Margaret, recognized as wife regarding Sir John de- Keith (get a hold of backup off blog post less than) who was simply 2ndly age are given where post: the spouse Emma I would recommend is of some other family unit members, and not mother of your next Earl Malise.

Scots Peerage, sub _Comyn, Earl out of Buchan_ , claims simply, ‘Malise, Earl from Strathearn https://kissbrides.com/american-women/denver-mo/, got a wife Emma, within the 1261-1267, whoever surname is not familiar ‘[SP II:256, cites Cal. from Docs., i. 2383, 2451]. a while prior to 1270, to make sure that their widow (Margaret) would have been “available” a bit once Emma.

It was obviously a conjecture; it does have the benefit of coping with a well-known matchmaking between Muriel Keith and you can Reginald ce Cheyne. Any further associated files carry out naturally become greet.

Brand new account from inside the Scots Peerage regarding group of Keith states out-of Sir John de- Keith (d. ca. 1270) he is thought to provides hitched Comyn, earl away from Buchan . It personality, of not sure (“thought to had been”) diversity, are now able to feel remedied in accordance with the pursuing the dispensation, dated at Fondi towards 14 The month of january 1378/9::

‘ Reg Aven 215, fifty Towards bishop off Moray. Professors to help you distribute Reginald Cheyn, donzel, and you may Murielle, damselle, d de Keth, off Moray and you will Aberdeen dioceses, throughout the impediment in order to relationships due to the third and you will 4th levels of consanguinity. Fondi, 19 Kal. Feb., anno 1. SRO Vat. Trans., iv, no. 46. ‘

Muriel Keith, tomorrow 2nd wife away from Robert Stewart, initially Duke from Albany (d. 1420), are developed to help you get married Reginald le Cheyne, young man regarding Sir Reginald le Cheyne by their partner (as her first husband), Helen out-of Strathearn. If you find yourself you will find celebrated holes regarding origins away from Muriel Keith, she and Reginald le Cheyne create display a descent in the Comyns. not, this will be also faraway to require a good dispensation in the event that Muriel is an effective-great-higher grandd Comyn, Earl out-of Buchan (d. 1233), that will function as case when the is the reason child.

dos. Reginald ce Cheyne is a good-grandson out-of Marjory Comyn, daughter from Alexander Comyn, Earl off Buchan (d. 1290), son out of William Comyn in the above list. Their own young buck is Malise, Earl off Strathearn regarding 1312 to their passing from inside the 1328 , and you can father from Reginald.

california. 1270), are identical to Marjory Comyn, and you can married 2ndly to Malise, Earl out of Strathearn (d. 1312). This will indicate brand new parentage a€?thought to has been’ regarding Margaret, spouse out of Sir John de Keith, try away from that age bracket: she would not have started the fresh new d Comyn, Earl from Buchan, but instead out of his young man Alexander. There is absolutely no evidence one Earl Malise and you can Marjory Comyn have been partnered far in advance of 1275: because Lindsay wrote,

There is certainly one to discernable basis on which the connection ranging from Reginald le Cheyne and you may Muriel Keith could have lived: if the Margaret Comyn, partner of Sir John de- Keith (d

‘ The new spouse from the earl, on the 1275, try named Marjory, while we understand the attesting condition from No. cv., which will be mentioned from the Wyntoun, Book VIII. chap. vi., getting come the following brother off John Comyn, Earl of Buchan, who negotiated on the part of Earl Malise the wedding payment a lot more than mentioned [dated in the London area, April 26, 1293 to have his daughter Matilda and you can Robert de- Tony, son from Ralph].’

Alexander Comyn = E de Quincy E away from Buchan We __________________I________________ We III step 1) Sir John = Marjory = 2) Malise de- Keith I (als I E of Strathearn . 1270 I Margaret) I d. 1312 _____________I__ ___I__________________________ I We We I We We Sir William Bernard Malise Gilbert Robert Maud de- Keith de Keith Age out of = Robert d. bef 1293 Strathearn; d. 1328 de- Tony I ______I_______________________ I We I I Sir Edward Malise Mary Helen = Isabella de Elizabeth from Strathearn = 1) Sir Reginald Synton d. california. 1343 We le Cheyne I We I = 2) Sir David We V I I de Graham Sir William de- I We__________ Keith I I = Margaret Fraser __________________I_______ V __I_____________ We We I III I We I I Muriel + Reginald Mary Mariota Keith le Cheyne (= Robert Stewart, Duke off Albany)